The lawyers at our firm, the Riviere Advocacy Group have the experience with the above rules in suppressing evidence seized as a result of unlawful searches by police agencies.
Since a warrantless search is presumed invalid, the state bears the burden of establishing that one of the exceptions allowing for a warrantless search applies. The standard of proof is a proponderance of the evidence. What this means is that the prosecution must prove that it is more likely than not that the facts establish an exception allowing for a search without a warrant otherwise a motion to suppress will defeat the search.
A defendant has enumerated protections under New Jersey Rule of Evidence 104 when he/she testifies at a suppression hearing. By testifying in a suppression hearing the defendant may only be cross-examined about the subject matter of the direct testimony at a Suppression Hearing. Also, the defendant’s testimony at the hearing may not be used against him/her later at trial.
Call us today to discuss how we can possibly suppress evidence obtained in an unlawful manner and is now being used in a case against you in Municipal Court. One of our lawyers is available now to discuss your case. Call us at (732) 64-NJLAW (65529)